Drawing for COLORITA

USPTO serial 79176066

COLORITA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FALK, JONATHAN ROBERT
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 111 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with COLORITA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
031Natural plants and flowersSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
035Wholesale ordering services in the field of natural plants and flowers; retail store services featuring natural plants and flowersSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
044Horticulture services; propagation, improvement, cultivation and selection of natural plants and flowersSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 26, 2026DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Jun 14, 2018CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Aug 11, 2017FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 25, 2017FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jul 25, 2017FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Apr 28, 2017OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 12, 2017OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Apr 12, 2017OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Dec 30, 2016NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jul 25, 2016MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 25, 2016ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 4, 2016RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 17, 2015RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Dec 17, 2015RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Dec 17, 2015RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Dec 16, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 15, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 24, 2015MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Nov 18, 2015NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Nov 17, 2015LIMILIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED—
Nov 15, 2015REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance