USPTO serial 79176202
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Security surveillance apparatus; alarms (instruments); electronic intrusion detection apparatus; electronic motion sensors and detectors for detecting opening of windows and doors; wireless communication devices for transmission and/or reception of surveillance and security data | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 14, 2025 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 25, 2020 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Aug 4, 2017 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 19, 2017 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 19, 2017 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 28, 2017 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 12, 2017 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 12, 2017 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 19, 2016 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 19, 2016 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 5, 2016 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Jan 15, 2016 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 28, 2015 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 22, 2015 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Dec 22, 2015 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Dec 21, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 17, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 21, 2015 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Nov 17, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 15, 2015 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |