USPTO serial 79176494
NOLAN PRIVATE SELECTION SUCCULENT AUSTRALIAN BEEF
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CARROLL, DORITT
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with NOLAN PRIVATE SELECTION SUCCULENT AUSTRALIAN BEEF?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Colleen Flynn Goss
Colleen Flynn Goss Fay Sharpe LLP1228 Euclid AvenueThe Halle Building, 5th FloorCleveland, OH 44115Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Meat; minced meat; preserved meat namely tinned meat, salted meat and dried meat; meat extracts; meat jellies; meat pastes and meat pates namely liver pate; small meat products and other processed meats namely prosciutto, salami, frankfurters, sausages, black pudding, blood sausage, ham, meat patties and bacon; offal; game (not being live game); prepared meals predominantly of meat or comprising meat and vegetables; meat substitutes prepared from vegetables and other meat substitutes included in this class; meat based soups and preparations for making such soups; bouillon from meat, bouillon concentrates and preparations for making bouillon; broth from meat and broth concentrates; and animal marrow for food; meat substitutes prepared from cereals | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 030 | Pastries containing meat; sandwiches, namely sandwiches with meat fillings; meat pies; sausage rolls; meat dumplings; hamburger sandwiches; hot dog sandwiches; pizzas; pastry rolls containing meat and vegetable; dim sums namely pork rolls; spring rolls; cereal based snack foods, namely such goods containing meat or having a meat flavor; gravies namely meat gravies, and powders and mixes for making gravies; meat tenderizers, for household purposes; sauces namely ketchup and mustard | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 13, 2025 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 13, 2025 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Nov 12, 2020 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 3, 2018 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 12, 2018 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 12, 2018 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 5, 2017 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 19, 2017 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 19, 2017 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 12, 2017 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 12, 2017 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 5, 2016 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 5, 2016 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 5, 2016 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 16, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 16, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 26, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 25, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 25, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 11, 2015 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 25, 2015 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 25, 2015 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Nov 25, 2015 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Nov 23, 2015 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Nov 22, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 21, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 21, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 19, 2015 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |