Drawing for RATHLOC

USPTO serial 79176808

RATHLOC

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 4948719Status 739Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
May 3, 2016
Examiner
GLASSER, CARYN
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with RATHLOC?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Boris Umansky

Boris Umansky Ladas & Parry224 S Michigan Ave, Suite 1600Chicago, IL 60604UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
019Fireclay bricks; refractory bricks containing chrome-corundum; refractory bricks containing zircon oxide; refractory bricks containing alumina and magnesia spinel; acid resisting bricks; pre-cast blocks, namely, bricks as building units; refractory components, namely, refractory bricks, refractory cement, refractory concrete, refractor blocks not of metal, and refractor construction materials not of metal, as building materials; insulating fire bricksACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 3, 2025REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
May 20, 2023NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
May 20, 2023C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
May 19, 2023APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Nov 2, 2022ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
May 3, 2021REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
Feb 15, 2018NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Feb 8, 2018NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Aug 26, 2016FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 4, 2016FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Aug 4, 2016FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Aug 3, 2016FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
May 3, 2016R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Feb 16, 2016NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Feb 16, 2016PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 13, 2016GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 27, 2016OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Jan 27, 2016OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jan 27, 2016NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jan 8, 2016RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 6, 2016CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 5, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 4, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 4, 2016TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 21, 2015RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Dec 21, 2015RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Dec 19, 2015RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Dec 18, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 17, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 27, 2015MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Nov 23, 2015NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Nov 19, 2015REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance