Drawing for NIQ

USPTO serial 79176809

NIQ

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
GLASSER, CARYN
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 108 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with NIQ?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Electric motors; gear motors; pumps and other turbo-engines with electric motor driven actuation; axial flow blowers; centrifugal blowersSECTION 70 - CANCELLED
009Electronic control devices for electric motor driven actuationsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED
011Apparatus for ventilating; ventilating fansSECTION 70 - CANCELLED
042Engineering services, particularly in the development of ventilation equipment and electric motorsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 16, 2026DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Sep 22, 2017FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Aug 17, 2017FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Aug 17, 2017FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
May 5, 2017OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
Apr 19, 2017OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Apr 19, 2017OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Nov 18, 2016LIMNLIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED
Nov 10, 2016LIMGLIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB
Aug 17, 2016MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 17, 2016ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 5, 2016RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Jan 20, 2016RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Jan 20, 2016RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Jan 19, 2016RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Jan 18, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 14, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Nov 27, 2015MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED
Nov 23, 2015NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Nov 19, 2015REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance