USPTO serial 79176820
EXHALE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MARTIN, EUGENIA K
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with EXHALE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Marsha G. Gentner
MARSHA G. GENTNER DYKEMA GOSSETT PLLC1301 K ST NW STE 1100WASHINGTON, DC 20005-3317UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Socks, other than socks for sports; stockings, other than stockings for sports; tights, other than tights for sports; panty hose | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 16, 2026 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 16, 2026 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| May 29, 2025 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| May 3, 2019 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 12, 2019 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 12, 2019 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 12, 2018 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 12, 2018 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 11, 2017 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Sep 11, 2017 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 11, 2017 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 5, 2017 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 19, 2017 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 19, 2017 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 17, 2017 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Feb 16, 2017 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 8, 2016 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 8, 2016 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 8, 2016 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 20, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 19, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 19, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 5, 2016 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 19, 2016 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 19, 2016 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jan 16, 2016 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jan 15, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 14, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 27, 2015 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Nov 23, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 19, 2015 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |