USPTO serial 79176852
LA BASE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BELL, MARLENE D
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 118- EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with LA BASE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
J. Rodman Steele, Jr.
J. Rodman Steele, Jr. DUANE MORRIS LLP30 South 17 StreetBR-IPPhiladelphia, PA 19103-4196Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 008 | Spoons; forks; non-electric cheese slicers; non-electric pizza cutters; dried bonito planes, namely, non-electric planes for flaking dried bonito blocks; sugar tongs; can openers; nutcrackers not of precious metal; non-electric egg slicers; bladed or pointed hand tools, namely, cheese cutters, cheese slicers, non-electric fruit peelers, non-electric vegetable peelers, ice picks, chef knives, kitchen knives, butter knives, paring knives, desert knives, meat knives, steak knives, cake knives, table knives, vegetable slicers | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 021 | Stainless steel cooking bowls; cooking vats; ice pails; whisks; strainers; pepper pots, sugar bowls and salt shakers not of precious metal; egg cups not of precious metal; napkin holders and napkin rings not of precious metal; serving trays not of precious metal; toothpick holders not of precious metal; colanders, namely, round colanders and square colanders; shakers, namely, salt and pepper shakers; rice scoops; hand-operated coffee grinders and pepper mills; funnels; Japanese style wooden pestles; Japanese style earthenware mortars; dining trays; bottle openers; radish graters; household utensils, namely, spatulas; pan-mats, namely, drip mats for tea; chopsticks; chopstick cases; ladles and dippers, namely, pasta dippers, honey dippers, kitchen ladles and serving ladles; cooking sieves and sifters; cutting boards; rolling pins; grills; toothpicks; lemon squeezers; non-electric waffle irons; cleaning tools and washing utensils, namely, cleaning sponges, scrub sponge, scrub brushes and cleaning cloths for household use; cooking pots, cooking pans, frying pans; non-electric coffee-pots not of precious metal; iron kettles; kettles; tableware not of precious metal, namely, serving forks, pasta serving forks, cooking forks and mixing spoons, serving spoons, slotted spoons, basting spoons, ice cream spoons; portable cold boxes, namely, portable coolers; rice chests; food preserving jars of glass; drinking flasks; vacuum bottles | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 8, 2018 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 7, 2018 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Apr 27, 2018 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 5, 2018 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 4, 2018 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 2, 2017 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| May 5, 2017 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 19, 2017 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 19, 2017 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 6, 2017 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 4, 2017 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 25, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 25, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 25, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 24, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 24, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 11, 2016 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 6, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 8, 2016 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 18, 2015 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 18, 2015 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Dec 18, 2015 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Dec 17, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 11, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 27, 2015 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Nov 23, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 19, 2015 | SDRC | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB | — |