Drawing for RIDE THE WAVE

USPTO serial 79176939

RIDE THE WAVE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 5015230Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Aug 9, 2016
Examiner
KING, CHRISTINA B
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with RIDE THE WAVE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Kiranjit K Dharsan

Kiranjit K Dharsan Seiter IP1110 N Virgil Ave, Suite #98436Los Angeles, CA 90029United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041Online video production services; provision of training and educational services, namely, providing classes, seminars, workshops in the field of video production; providing advice and information in the field of video production for educational, entertainment and recreational purposesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 9, 2026DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Apr 9, 2026DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Feb 12, 2026TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Feb 12, 2026ECDRTEAS CHANGE OF DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVES ADDRESS—
Feb 12, 2026ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 12, 2026REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Aug 9, 2025REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Oct 14, 2022NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Oct 14, 202271AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Oct 12, 2022APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Apr 13, 2022ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Apr 2, 2022CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Jun 22, 2018NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jan 6, 2017FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 19, 2016FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Dec 19, 2016FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Nov 9, 2016FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Aug 9, 2016R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
May 24, 2016PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 4, 2016NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Apr 13, 2016CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 26, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 25, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 25, 2016TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 1, 2016RFNPREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 13, 2016RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jan 13, 2016RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jan 12, 2016RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jan 11, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 4, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 1, 2015MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Nov 27, 2015NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Nov 26, 2015REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance