Drawing for BIT

USPTO serial 79177040

BIT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CORNWELL, ANDREA B
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BIT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jeffrey H. Greger

Jeffrey H. Greger Hauptman Ham, LLP2318 Mill RoadSuite 1400Alexandria, VA 22314

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Automotive electric batteries; batteries for electric vehicles; batteries for land vehicles, water vehicles and air vehicles; electric batteries for land vehicles; batteries for powering electric vehicles; electric storage batteries for land vehicles; batteries for domestic use, namely batteries for powering household electric lighting, household engines, household motors and portable hand-held devices, namely computers and mobile telephones; electrical batteries for cars; rechargeable batteries for use with power hand tools; rechargeable cellular telephone batteriesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 16, 2026DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Apr 16, 2026DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Jan 5, 2019FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 20, 2018FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Dec 20, 2018FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Dec 20, 2017MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 20, 2017ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 19, 2017GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 19, 2017GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 19, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 12, 2017OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 29, 2017RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Apr 29, 2017ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 26, 2017OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Apr 26, 2017OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Oct 25, 2016GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Oct 25, 2016GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Oct 25, 2016CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Oct 25, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 25, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 20, 2016ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 7, 2016ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Sep 23, 2016RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 5, 2016GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Aug 5, 2016GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Aug 5, 2016CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jul 19, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 19, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 19, 2016TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 5, 2016RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 19, 2016RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jan 19, 2016RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jan 15, 2016RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jan 14, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 8, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 1, 2015MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Nov 27, 2015NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Nov 26, 2015REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance