Drawing for SCHLOSSGOLD

USPTO serial 79177270

SCHLOSSGOLD

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 5148454Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Feb 28, 2017
Examiner
DUBOIS, SUSAN L
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SCHLOSSGOLD?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Patrick J. Concannon

Patrick J. Concannon Nutter, McClennen & Fish, LLP155 Seaport BoulevardSeaport WestBoston, MA 02210-2604

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
032Non-alcoholic malt beverageSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 23, 2026DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Apr 23, 2026DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Jun 10, 2024INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
May 22, 2024INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
May 22, 2024INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
May 15, 2024INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Sep 15, 2023C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Jun 30, 2017FINVFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 15, 2017FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jun 15, 2017FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
May 28, 2017FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Feb 28, 2017R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Dec 16, 2016GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 13, 2016NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Dec 13, 2016PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 30, 2016OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Nov 30, 2016OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Nov 23, 2016NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Nov 4, 2016PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Nov 2, 2016CORRCORRECTION FROM IB ENTERED - NO REVIEW REQUIRED—
Oct 19, 2016CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 15, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 15, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 15, 2016ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 5, 2016ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 5, 2016REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Oct 5, 2016TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Oct 5, 2016NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - MAILED—
Oct 5, 2016TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 5, 2016PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Oct 5, 2016PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Aug 12, 2016MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 12, 2016ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 12, 2016MREINOTICE OF REINSTATEMENT MAILED—
Aug 11, 2016REINREINSTATED—
Aug 4, 2016CRCVCORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB—
May 6, 2016DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
May 5, 2016DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Feb 12, 2016RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 21, 2016RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jan 21, 2016RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jan 21, 2016RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jan 20, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 20, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 5, 2015MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Dec 1, 2015NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Nov 26, 2015SDRCSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance