Drawing for PERLAGE

USPTO serial 79177286

PERLAGE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 608
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LEE, JEANIE H
Law office
PETITIONS OFFICE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PERLAGE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

CHRISTINE MARIE WALLACE

CHRISTINE MARIE WALLACE LAW OFFICES OF ANTHONY S. CANNATELLA53 ORCHARD STREETMANHASSET, NY 11030UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
033Alcoholic beverages except beersACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 8, 2019FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 18, 2019FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Feb 16, 2019FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
May 16, 2018PR.WPETITION TO REVIVE WITHDRAWN—
May 8, 2018APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF—
Mar 25, 2018TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 25, 2018PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Jan 25, 2018MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 25, 2018ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 28, 2017RDX3NOTIFICATION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED—
Jun 28, 2017RDX1ACTION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED E-MAILED—
Jun 28, 2017RRDXACTION REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED COUNTED NOT MAILED—
May 12, 2017OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
May 5, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 4, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 4, 2017ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Apr 26, 2017OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Apr 26, 2017OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Nov 4, 2016GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Nov 4, 2016GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 4, 2016CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 25, 2016RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Jul 27, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 26, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 26, 2016TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 26, 2016RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 26, 2016RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jan 26, 2016RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jan 23, 2016RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jan 22, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 13, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 5, 2015MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Dec 1, 2015NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Nov 26, 2015SDRCSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance