Drawing for SAN-EI

USPTO serial 79177333

SAN-EI

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 5015238Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Aug 9, 2016
Examiner
NOBLE, ANNIE MELISSA
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SAN-EI?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Monika R. Oyama

Monika R. Oyama MASUDA, FUNAI, EIFERT & MITCHELL, LTD.203 N. LaSalle StreetSuite 2500Chicago, IL 60601

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
001Chemicals for use in the manufacture of food; artificial sweetenersSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
002Food dyes; colorants for use in the manufacture of food; synthetic and natural dyestuffs for use in the manufacture of food; pigmentsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
003Aromatic and flavoring materials, namely, natural flavorings prepared from plants in the nature of essential oils and food flavorings prepared from essential oilsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
030Seasonings; spices; non-nutritional aromatic preparations for use in food; gluten prepared as foodstuff, namely, dried pieces of wheat gluten, maize gluten meal; ice cream mixes; sherbet mixes; starch-based binding agents for ice cream; polysaccharide-based binding agents for ice cream; meat tenderizers for household purposes; starch-based thickeners for stiffening whipped cream; polysaccharide-based thickeners for stiffening whipped creamSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 22, 2026DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Jan 22, 2026DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Nov 20, 2023INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Oct 27, 2023INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Oct 27, 2023INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Oct 24, 2023INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Feb 24, 2023C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Aug 9, 2021REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
Dec 9, 2016FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 22, 2016FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Nov 22, 2016FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Nov 9, 2016FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Aug 9, 2016R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
May 24, 2016NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
May 24, 2016PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 4, 2016NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Apr 11, 2016CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 2, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 1, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 1, 2016TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 31, 2015RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 9, 2015RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Dec 9, 2015RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Dec 8, 2015RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Dec 8, 2015MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Dec 7, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 4, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 4, 2015NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Dec 3, 2015REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance