Drawing for RICHARD DELISLE

USPTO serial 79177738

RICHARD DELISLE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 5084183Status 739Renewal
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Nov 22, 2016
Examiner
FINK, GINA M
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.

Need help with RICHARD DELISLE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $399*

Plus Government fees of $650

Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

John S. Egbert

John S. Egbert Egbert, McDaniel & Swartz, PLLC1001 Texas Ave., Suite 1250Houston, TX 77002UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
033Alcoholic beverages, except beers; hard ciders; digesters, namely, liqueurs and spirits; wines; liqueur wines produced in Charentes in accordance with specific standards; spirits; eaux-de-vie, namely, brandy; brandy; brandy, namely, cognacACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 13, 2026REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Mar 14, 2024RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Feb 19, 2023NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Feb 19, 2023C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Feb 14, 2023EROPTEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED—
Feb 10, 2023PR75POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 71 & 15—
Feb 10, 2023APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Aug 1, 2022ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Apr 16, 2022NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Nov 22, 2021REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
Aug 3, 2018NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Mar 24, 2017FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 7, 2017FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Mar 7, 2017FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Feb 22, 2017FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Nov 22, 2016R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Sep 9, 2016OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 6, 2016NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Sep 6, 2016PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 17, 2016OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Aug 17, 2016OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Aug 17, 2016NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Aug 3, 2016PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 2, 2016CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 13, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 13, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 12, 2016ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 6, 2016TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 4, 2016RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 12, 2016RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Feb 12, 2016RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Feb 11, 2016RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Feb 10, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 3, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 11, 2015MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Dec 7, 2015NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Dec 3, 2015SDRCSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance