USPTO serial 79177834
BYNDER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PAQUIN, SAMUEL ROBERT
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BYNDER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Software for digital asset management and platforms; software for brand asset management and marketing asset management; computer programs for document management, project management and communication; computer software programs for the integration of text, audio, graphics, still images and moving pictures into an interactive delivery for multimedia applications; computer software for organizing and viewing digital images and photographs; electronic databases recorded on computer media featuring information in the fields of branding and brand management; software for webshops; software for managing information about products; software for desktop publishing | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | Providing temporary use of online non-downloadable digital asset management software, software for preparation, composition, and compilation of digital assets and electronic and print documents; computer software design and development; development of software solutions; technical consultancy and advisory services in relation to technology and software products for the planning, purchasing, placement and optimization of on-line, interactive, television, cable, broadband, mobile and related new media inventory and advertising content; consultancy in the field of software and ict- services and relating to the use of digital platforms and media for advertising and marketing purposes; technical research; hosting of digital content on the internet; web hosting; software as a service (saas); rental of software | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 2, 2026 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| May 21, 2022 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 8, 2019 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Feb 22, 2018 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 22, 2017 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 9, 2017 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 9, 2017 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 26, 2017 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 10, 2017 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| May 10, 2017 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 9, 2016 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 9, 2016 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 27, 2016 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 19, 2016 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jan 12, 2016 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 12, 2016 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jan 9, 2016 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jan 8, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 6, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 18, 2015 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Dec 14, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 11, 2015 | LIMI | LIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Dec 10, 2015 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |