USPTO serial 79178247
GLADIATOR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 6155623Status 706Renewal
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 22, 2020
- Examiner
- LAM, HAI-LY HUYNH
- Law office
- Historical data usage
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with GLADIATOR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $748*
Plus Government fees of $850
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Hassan Abbas Shakir
Hassan Abbas Shakir Shakir Law PLLC880 Third Ave., 6th FloorNew York, NY 10022United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Socks, namely, electrically heated socks for protection against injuries due to cold conditions and not for medical purposes; diving suits incorporating tear-resistant fabric, puncture-resistant fabric, oil-resistant fabric, or dirt-resistant fabric; protective garments for hunters, namely, protective outerwear for protection against injuries caused by branches of trees and attacks by hunted deer, namely, protective coats, protective overcoats, protective jackets, protective overalls, protective tracking pants | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | Insoles for shoes and not for orthopedic use; winter clothing, namely, winter coats, winter pants; tear-resistant hiking clothing, namely, tear-resistant hiking coats, tear-resistant hiking overcoats, tear-resistant hiking jackets, tear-resistant hiking vests, tear-resistant hiking overalls, tear-resistant hiking pants, tear-resistant hiking shorts, tear-resistant hiking caps being headwear, and tear-resistant hiking gloves; oil-resistant hiking clothing, namely, oil-resistant hiking coats, oil-resistant hiking over-coats, oil-resistant hiking jackets, oil-resistant hiking vests, oil-resistant hiking overalls, oil-resistant hiking pants, oil-resistant hiking shorts, oil-resistant hiking caps being headwear, and oil-resistant hiking gloves; dirt-resistant hiking clothing, namely, dirt-resistant hiking coats, dirt-resistant hiking overcoats, dirt-resistant hiking jackets, dirt-resistant hiking vests, dirt-resistant hiking overalls, dirt-resistant hiking pants, dirt-resistant hiking shorts, dirt-resistant hiking caps being headwear, and dirt-resistant hiking gloves; clothing for motorists, motorcyclists, bicyclists and bikers incorporating tear-resistant fabric, oil-resistant fabric, or dirt-resistant fabric, namely, coats, overcoats, jackets, vests, overalls, hats, caps being headwear, gloves, and shorts; trekking clothing, namely, trekking jackets, trekking trousers, and overalls; tippets being fur shawls; sweat absorbing under-clothing; outerwear and underclothing for sports, namely, sports jerseys, sports bras | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Pfanner Schutzbekleidung GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by Pfanner Schutzbekleidung GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by Pfanner Schutzbekleidung GmbH
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Similar marks named GLADIATOR
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 28, 2026 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 28, 2026 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Oct 19, 2026 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 22, 2026 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 10, 2026 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 22, 2025 | REM3 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 10, 2025 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 17, 2022 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Jan 30, 2021 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 8, 2021 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 8, 2021 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Dec 22, 2020 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 22, 2020 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 5, 2020 | PC.D | PETITION TO DIRECTOR DISMISSED | — |
| Jun 30, 2020 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Jan 8, 2020 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Dec 19, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 19, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 18, 2019 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 18, 2019 | PGRR | PETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 12, 2019 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Oct 16, 2019 | ISPO | WITHDRAWN FROM ISSUE - PETITIONS OFFICE REQUEST | — |
| Sep 24, 2019 | PCRC | PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 24, 2019 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 24, 2019 | TPDR | TEAS PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 10, 2019 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 10, 2019 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 10, 2019 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 10, 2019 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 6, 2019 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 21, 2019 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 21, 2019 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 21, 2019 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 8, 2019 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 24, 2019 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 24, 2019 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 24, 2019 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 24, 2019 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 9, 2019 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| May 30, 2019 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Mar 8, 2019 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 8, 2019 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 8, 2019 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 14, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 14, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 22, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 21, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 21, 2019 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 7, 2019 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 18, 2018 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Apr 5, 2018 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 5, 2018 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 5, 2018 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 16, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 16, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 13, 2018 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 13, 2018 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Mar 13, 2018 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Mar 13, 2018 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Sep 13, 2017 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Sep 13, 2017 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 13, 2017 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 22, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 21, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 21, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 26, 2017 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 10, 2017 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| May 10, 2017 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 13, 2017 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Feb 21, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 21, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 21, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 30, 2017 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 28, 2016 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 28, 2016 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 28, 2016 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 13, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 13, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 13, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 12, 2016 | ATRV | ATTORNEY REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 31, 2016 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 29, 2016 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jan 14, 2016 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 13, 2016 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 13, 2016 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jan 12, 2016 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jan 11, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 5, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 18, 2015 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Dec 14, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 10, 2015 | SDRC | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB | — |