USPTO serial 79178655
LIJILEBAO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 5262879Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 15, 2017
- Examiner
- NOVAKOVIC, MIROSLAV
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with LIJILEBAO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
SICHUAN LIJI PICKLE & FLAVOURING CO., LTD.
CN
Other trademarks owned by SICHUAN LIJI PICKLE & FLAVOURING CO., LTD.
SICHUAN LIJI PICKLE & FLAVOURING CO., LTD.
CN
Other trademarks owned by SICHUAN LIJI PICKLE & FLAVOURING CO., LTD.
SICHUAN LIJI LEBAO FOOD CO., LTD.
CN
SICHUAN LIJI PICKLE & FLAVOURING CO., LTD.
CN
Other trademarks owned by SICHUAN LIJI PICKLE & FLAVOURING CO., LTD.
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Charcuterie; meat, preserved; meat, canned; vegetables, canned; pickles; preserved vegetables; preparations for making soups; preserved truffles; preserved soya beans for food; cream being dairy products; milk; beverages consisting principally of milk; milk products excluding ice cream, ice milk and frozen yogurt; edible fats; sesame oil; processed peanuts; sea-cucumbers, not live; fruits in preserved form; jams; vegetable salads; fruit jellies [not being confectionery]; soy-based food beverage used as a milk substitute; processed mushrooms | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 030 | Wheat flour [for food]; rice; flour for food; noodles; soya flour; starch for use in manufacturing food; flavorings for foods being non-essential oils; ketchup; chow-chow as condiment; relish; vinegar; soy sauce [soya sauce]; coffee; tea; tea-based beverages; sugar; pastries; ice cream; cooking salt; garden herbs, preserved [seasonings] | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by SICHUAN LIJI PICKLE & FLAVOURING CO., LTD.
- Other trademarks owned by SICHUAN LIJI PICKLE & FLAVOURING CO., LTD.
- Other trademarks owned by SICHUAN LIJI LEBAO FOOD CO., LTD.
- Other trademarks owned by SICHUAN LIJI PICKLE & FLAVOURING CO., LTD.
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Similar marks named LIJILEBAO
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 7, 2026 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| May 7, 2026 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Nov 29, 2024 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Oct 21, 2024 | INPS | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 21, 2024 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Oct 5, 2024 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Sep 13, 2024 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Sep 5, 2024 | WOAG | WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY GRANTED | — |
| Sep 5, 2024 | WOAR | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 4, 2024 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 4, 2024 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Feb 4, 2024 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| May 31, 2023 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 5, 2018 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 5, 2017 | XXSS | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 5, 2017 | XXCR | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED | — |
| Nov 15, 2017 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 15, 2017 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 3, 2017 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 30, 2017 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 27, 2017 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 20, 2017 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 17, 2017 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| May 17, 2017 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 10, 2017 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| May 10, 2017 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 10, 2017 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 21, 2017 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 15, 2017 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 13, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 13, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 13, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 11, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 10, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 1, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 1, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 28, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 21, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 20, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 2, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 2, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 21, 2016 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 12, 2016 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 12, 2016 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - MAILED | — |
| Oct 12, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 12, 2016 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Oct 12, 2016 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 7, 2016 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 7, 2016 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 27, 2016 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 10, 2016 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 10, 2016 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Feb 10, 2016 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Feb 9, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 2, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 29, 2015 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Dec 22, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 18, 2015 | LIMI | LIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Dec 17, 2015 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |