Drawing for MARDEL

USPTO serial 79178700

MARDEL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MICKLEBURGH, LINDA BOHANNON
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with MARDEL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029Meat, fish, poultry and game; meat extracts, preserved, dried and cooked fruit and vegetables, jellies for food, edible jellies, jams, compotes, eggs, milk and dairy products, edible oils and fats; canned fish and canned meatACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 28, 2025RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Mar 30, 2018FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 17, 2017GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 20, 2017FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 6, 2017FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Sep 6, 2017FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jun 3, 2017OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
May 17, 2017OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
May 17, 2017OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Sep 6, 2016MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 6, 2016ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 27, 2016RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 8, 2016RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Feb 8, 2016RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Feb 5, 2016RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Feb 4, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 1, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 29, 2015MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Dec 22, 2015NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Dec 18, 2015LIMILIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED—
Dec 17, 2015REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance