Drawing for SMART INTEGO

USPTO serial 79178865

SMART INTEGO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 5288108Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Sep 19, 2017
Examiner
ROACH, APRIL K
Law office
PETITIONS OFFICE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SMART INTEGO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Catherine F. Hoffman

Catherine F. Hoffman Dickinson Wright PLLC350 East Las Olas Blvd, Suite 1750Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Electric door closers, electric window closersSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
009Electric locks; [ computer software, including in the form of apps, namely, configuration software for electronic door locks; ] digital locking cylinders, transponders, and measuring, signalling and checking apparatus and instruments in the nature of wireless radio frequency operated electronic door locks for the integration into third party access control systems, all in the field of locking technology and access control; electric apparatus and instruments in the field of locking technology and access control, namely, wireless radio frequency operated electronic door locks for the integration into third party access control systems; biometric reader keypads; digital cam locks; digital padlocks; all aforementioned goods in this class being in the field of locking technology and access controlSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 19, 2026DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Mar 19, 2026DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Feb 1, 2025INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Jan 16, 2025INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Jan 15, 2025INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Dec 6, 2024INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Apr 5, 2024C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Sep 19, 2022REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
Jul 26, 2019CORVREVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE - CERTIFICATE OF REG MAILED—
Jul 24, 2019PCGRPETITION TO DIRECTOR GRANTED—
Jul 23, 2019APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF—
Jun 19, 2019ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 19, 2019REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Mar 21, 2019TPDRTEAS PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED—
Dec 8, 2018INNAINVALIDATION REVIEWED - NO ACTION REQUIRED BY OFFICE—
Dec 4, 2018TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Nov 30, 2018INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Aug 1, 2018TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Mar 30, 2018COC.CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED—
Mar 30, 2018APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Mar 29, 2018LIMELIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED AND ENTERED—
Mar 23, 2018LIMGLIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB—
Feb 10, 2018FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 11, 2018FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jan 11, 2018FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Dec 19, 2017FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Sep 19, 2017R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jul 4, 2017NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jul 4, 2017PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 1, 2017GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 14, 2017OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Jun 14, 2017OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jun 14, 2017NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jun 3, 2017OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
May 24, 2017EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
May 23, 2017CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 22, 2017JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
May 17, 2017OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
May 17, 2017OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Feb 9, 2017DMCCDATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED—
Feb 8, 2017ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 7, 2017GNS1NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED—
Feb 7, 2017GNSFSUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED—
Feb 7, 2017CFRCSUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN—
Jan 30, 2017ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Jan 30, 2017EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jan 30, 2017JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jan 30, 2017EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jul 28, 2016GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Jul 28, 2016GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 28, 2016CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 7, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 6, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 6, 2016TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 22, 2016RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 6, 2016RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jan 6, 2016RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jan 1, 2016MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Dec 29, 2015RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Dec 28, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 28, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 28, 2015NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Dec 17, 2015REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance