Drawing for COVERTECH

USPTO serial 79179004

COVERTECH

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 5229874Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jun 27, 2017
Examiner
HACK, ANDREA R
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with COVERTECH?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Bryce J. Maynard

Bryce J. Maynard Buchanan Ingersoll & Rooney PC1737 KING STREET, SUITE 500Alexandria, VA 22314UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
012Windshield wipers; windshield wiper components, namely, windshield wiper blades, fasteners specially adapted for connecting windshield wiper blades, windshield wiper arms, deflectors, all sold as parts for vehicle windshield wipers; windshield wiper movement transmission assemblies sold as parts for land vehicle windshield wipers; windshield wiper support plates; windshield washers in the nature of installed vehicle machinery for cleaning the windshield; windshield washer bottles in the nature of installed vehicle machinery for cleaning the windshield; headlight washers in the nature of installed vehicle machinery for cleaning the headlight; headlight wipers; windshield washer devices for vehicles, including those remotely activated with a smartphone or with remote control car keys; parts and components for windshield washer devices in the nature of installed vehicle machinery for cleaning the windshield, namely, tanks, tank cartridges, pumps, controllers, nozzles, and pipes; windshield washer devices for vehicles, in the form of prefabricated kits for installation as vehicle equipmentSECTION 71 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 28, 2026DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED
May 28, 2026DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Oct 7, 2024INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB
Sep 14, 2024INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB
Sep 14, 2024INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED
Sep 13, 2024INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED
Jan 12, 2024C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71
Jun 27, 2022REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED
Oct 28, 2017FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Sep 28, 2017FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Sep 28, 2017FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
Sep 27, 2017FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Jun 27, 2017R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jun 9, 2017OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
May 24, 2017OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
May 24, 2017OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Apr 11, 2017NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED
Apr 11, 2017PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 8, 2017GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB
Mar 22, 2017OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Mar 22, 2017OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Mar 22, 2017NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED
Mar 3, 2017PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Feb 21, 2017CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Feb 20, 2017TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Feb 20, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Feb 20, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Feb 20, 2017ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED
Feb 1, 2017CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED
Jan 24, 2017ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Jan 3, 2017EWAFTEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS
Nov 1, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Aug 31, 2016GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED
Aug 31, 2016GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 31, 2016CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 10, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Aug 9, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Aug 9, 2016TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 26, 2016RFNPREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Mar 8, 2016RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Mar 8, 2016RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Mar 8, 2016RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Mar 7, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 28, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jan 5, 2016MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED
Dec 30, 2015NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Dec 29, 2015REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance