USPTO serial 79179049
FIRE & ICE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LOBO, DEBORAH E
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 109 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with FIRE & ICE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kathleen Cooney-Porter
Kathleen Cooney-Porter MUNCY, GEISSLER, OLDS & LOWE, P.C.4000 Legato RoadSuite 310Fairfax, VA 22033Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 011 | Apparatus for cooking, namely, cooktops; apparatus for refrigerating, namely, refrigerators; drying apparatus, namely, clothes drying machines; barbecues; cookers, namely, electric pressure cookers, electric rice cookers; domestic gas cookers; electric cookers, namely, bread cookers, slow cookers and egg cookers; electric slow cookers; electrical rice cookers; rice cookers; electric cooking utensils, namely, deep fryers, food steamers; electrical cooking utensils, namely, electrical broilers; cooking apparatus and installations, namely, gas and electric stoves; heating elements; heating plates, namely, plate warmers; hot plates; appliances for cooking, namely, electric cooking stoves; electrical household appliances for heating food, namely, food warmers; electric food steamers; electric cooking machines for preparing food, namely, cooktops; cooking apparatus, namely, electric spit roasters; electric cooking grills; portable cooking stoves; electric cooking stoves; electric domestic cooking appliances, namely, electric bread cookers, electric casseroles; electric steamers for cooking; electrical appliances for cooking, namely, electric cooktops, barbecues and baking ovens; electromagnetic cooking appliances, namely, microwave ovens; gas cooking appliances, namely, ovens and griddles; cooking appliances, namely, gas and electric grills; non-electric cooking appliances, namely, broiling pans; cooking apparatus, namely, ceramic stoves; Domestic electric frying pans; electric frying pans; gas cookers incorporating grills; domestic grill apparatus, namely, gas grills; grills for barbecuing; electric deep fryers; domestic electric deep fryers; domestic electric rotisseries; electric rotisseries; electric rotisseries for household use; home bread-making machines; electric woks; baking ovens; bread baking machines; domestic wood-burning stoves; electric stoves; gas stoves; electric kitchen stoves; oil stoves | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 021 | Non-electric cooking utensils, namely, basting spoons, spatulas, turners, and batter dispensers; non-electric deep fryers; non-electric food steamers; non-electric cooking pans; non-electric cooking pots; non-electric hand held kitchen utensils, namely, kitchen tongs, pouring and straining spouts; non-electric slow cookers; non-electric steamers for cooking; non-electric woks; household utensils, namely, sieves, spatulas, strainers, graters and skimmers; ceramics for household purposes, namely, ceramic figurines, sculptures, vases, vessels, bowls, plates and pots; cookware, namely, roasting pans, steamers, pots and pans; domestic cooking utensils, namely, grills and grill covers; cooking pots; cooking pans; frying pans, the aforementioned not being microwavable and freezable, sealable containers for consumer food storage with lid-sealing locking handles | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 14, 2026 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| May 14, 2026 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Sep 28, 2018 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 28, 2018 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 10, 2018 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 9, 2018 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 5, 2018 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 11, 2017 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 9, 2017 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 9, 2017 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 9, 2017 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 24, 2017 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| May 24, 2017 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 8, 2017 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Feb 8, 2017 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 8, 2017 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 10, 2017 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 5, 2017 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 10, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 9, 2016 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 9, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 9, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 9, 2016 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 6, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 6, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 6, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 10, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 10, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 10, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 9, 2016 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 9, 2016 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 4, 2016 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 17, 2016 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 17, 2016 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Feb 13, 2016 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Feb 12, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 11, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 5, 2016 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Dec 30, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 29, 2015 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |