Drawing for UV GLOW

USPTO serial 79179385

UV GLOW

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
SMITH, CYNTHIA RINALDI
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 100 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with UV GLOW?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Cosmetics; cosmetics for use on the skin or eyes; colour cosmetics for the skin or eyes; face paint; body paint (cosmetic)SECTION 70 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 21, 2026DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Nov 13, 2025ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB
Jan 29, 2021NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Dec 5, 2019CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB
Dec 18, 2017PRRDPETITION RECONSIDERATION REQUEST DENIED
Oct 28, 2017FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Oct 3, 2017PILMPETITION INQUIRY LETTER ISSUED
Sep 28, 2017FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Sep 28, 2017FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Sep 5, 2017APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF
Jul 6, 2017TPDRTEAS PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED
Jun 9, 2017OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
May 25, 2017PCDEPETITION TO DIRECTOR DENIED
May 24, 2017OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
May 24, 2017OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Mar 29, 2017PILMPETITION INQUIRY LETTER ISSUED
Mar 6, 2017APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF
Dec 28, 2016TPDRTEAS PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED
Sep 28, 2016MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 28, 2016ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 18, 2016RFNPREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Mar 2, 2016RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Mar 2, 2016RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Mar 2, 2016RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Mar 1, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 26, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jan 5, 2016MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED
Dec 31, 2015NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Dec 30, 2015REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance