Drawing for HEAD

USPTO serial 79179393

HEAD

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
ESTRADA, LINDA M
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with HEAD?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
008Choppers (knives); slicers; table cutlery (knives/forks and spoons); flat irons; hand drills (hand tools); tweezers; fingernail clippers; razor blades; non-electric hair clippers for personal use; hand-operated hair clippers; electric razors; electric hair clippers; razors, electric or non-electric; hair clippers for personal use, electric and non-electric; non-electric nasal hair trimmers; electric nasal hair trimmersSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 21, 2026DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Oct 28, 2017FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 11, 2017FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Oct 11, 2017FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jul 17, 2017LIMNLIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED—
Jul 7, 2017LIMGLIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB—
Jun 9, 2017OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
May 24, 2017OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
May 24, 2017OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Oct 11, 2016MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 11, 2016ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 18, 2016RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 29, 2016RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Feb 29, 2016RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Feb 28, 2016RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Feb 27, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 20, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 5, 2016MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Dec 31, 2015NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Dec 30, 2015REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance