USPTO serial 79179680
CECCATO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LUDEMAN, JESSICA ANN
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CECCATO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Meat; poultry; game; fruit and vegetables preserved and packaged; eggs; milk and products derived therefrom; cheeses; cured meats; cased meats; preserves; food oils; preserved tomatoes; skinned tomatoes; tinned tomatoes; tomato preserves; potato gnocchi | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | Flour/meals and cereal-based preparations; pasta; pasta of the following kinds: spaghetti, maccheroni, rigatoni, penne, conchiglie, eliche, farfalle, fusilli; cereal-based food mixtures, cereal-based mixtures for the preparation of cakes, pastries, desserts; rice; bread; pastries and confectionery; sugar; cereals prepared for human consumption; cereal-based preparations; dry and fresh pasta; pasta sauces; gnocchi | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 8, 2025 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 6, 2018 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 8, 2017 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 8, 2017 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 8, 2017 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 16, 2017 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 31, 2017 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| May 31, 2017 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 8, 2016 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 8, 2016 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 1, 2016 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 11, 2016 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 11, 2016 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jan 9, 2016 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jan 7, 2016 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jan 6, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 5, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 5, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 3, 2016 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |