Drawing for PEAKON

USPTO serial 79179684

PEAKON

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 5121555Status 739Renewal
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jan 17, 2017
Examiner
NOVAKOVIC,MIROSLAV
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.

Need help with PEAKON?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $1,097*

Plus Government fees of $1,950

Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Caitlin R. Byczko

Caitlin R. Byczko Barnes & Thornburg LLP11 South Meridian StreetIndianapolis, IN 46204UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer software for configuring, generating and transmitting electronic messages concerning topics of general employee productivity and well-being in the field of human resources, employment and organizational development; computer programs for configuring, generating and transmitting electronic messages to inform and educate users about employee productivity, retention issues and well-being; software for analysis purposes in the field of human resources; application software for configuring, generating and transmitting electronic messages concerning topics of general productivity, retention issues and well-being in the field of human resourcesACTIVE—
035Data processing services; arranging of subscriptions to software programming services for others; business consultancy in the field of human resources, employment recruiting, retention and organizational development; business consultancy services; Consulting services regarding data processing; Providing organizational development consulting services; Consultancy regarding human resources; employment recruiting and organizational development; Work analysis relating to management assistance, namely, to determine worker skill sets, productivity and other worker requirementsACTIVE—
042Software as a service (SaaS) for configuring, generating and transmitting electronic messages concerning topics of general employee productivity, retention issues and well-being in the field of human resources; IT programming services, namely, computer programming services; design and development of software and computer programs; rental of software and software applications; software consultancy servicesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 17, 2026REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Feb 27, 2025RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Jun 17, 2023NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Jun 17, 2023C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Jun 16, 2023APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Nov 30, 2022ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Jan 17, 2022REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
Oct 20, 2021CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Sep 18, 2021NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Aug 20, 2021NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jun 16, 2021CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Jun 16, 2021TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jun 16, 2021ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 16, 2021REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jun 16, 2021COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Mar 12, 2021NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Sep 18, 2020NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Oct 28, 2017GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 7, 2017ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Aug 4, 2017FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 15, 2017ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Apr 19, 2017FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Apr 19, 2017FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Apr 17, 2017FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jan 17, 2017R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Nov 1, 2016NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Nov 1, 2016PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 12, 2016OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Oct 12, 2016OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Oct 12, 2016NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Sep 27, 2016PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Sep 22, 2016CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 22, 2016XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Sep 22, 2016GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Sep 22, 2016GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Sep 22, 2016CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Aug 25, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 25, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 25, 2016ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 22, 2016TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 11, 2016RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 23, 2016RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Feb 23, 2016RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Feb 23, 2016RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Feb 22, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 16, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 9, 2016MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Jan 5, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jan 3, 2016REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance