USPTO serial 79179844
LABMASTER TWISTMAP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- YOUNG, CARRIE SKYE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 110
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with LABMASTER TWISTMAP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
CH-8623 Wetzikon, CH
CH-8623 Wetzikon, CH
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Dennis S. Prahl
RALPH H CATHCART LADAS & PARRY LLP1040 AVENUE OF THE AMERICASNEW YORK, NY 10018-3738UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software for monitoring, measuring and controlling the operation of textile machines and machines for testing textiles, fibers and threads; apparatus and instruments for monitoring, measuring and controlling textile machines and machines for testing textiles, fibers and threads, namely, optical sensors for textile machines; machines for testing textiles, fabric, fibers and threads | ABANDONED | — |
| 037 | Repair and maintenance of components and accessories for weaving machines and textile machines; repair and maintenance of apparatus and instruments for monitoring, measuring and controlling the operation of textile machines, weaving machines and machines for testing textiles, fibers and threads; repair and maintenance of machines for testing textiles, fibers and threads | ABANDONED | — |
| 042 | Technical support, namely, monitoring technological functions of computer network systems of textile machines for others; maintenance of software for monitoring, measuring and controlling of operation of textile machines and machines for testing textiles, fibers and threads; technological consultancy in the field of computer software for monitoring, measuring and controlling the operation of textile machines, weaving machines and machines for testing textiles, fibers and threads; technological consultancy with regard to textile machines, weaving machines and machines for testing textiles, fibers and threads and their parts and accessories; technological consulting with regard to apparatus and instruments for monitoring, measuring and controlling textile machines, weaving machines and machines for testing textiles, fibers and threads | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 25, 2026 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 25, 2026 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Dec 31, 2023 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 2, 2022 | CORN | CORRECTION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED | — |
| Jun 5, 2022 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Aug 20, 2021 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 15, 2019 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 31, 2019 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 31, 2019 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 31, 2018 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jan 31, 2018 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jan 31, 2018 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 31, 2018 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 1, 2017 | RFNP | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 17, 2017 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 14, 2017 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 14, 2017 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Nov 8, 2017 | OPNS | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 8, 2017 | OPNC | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) CREATED | — |
| Oct 10, 2017 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 10, 2017 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 20, 2017 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 20, 2017 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 20, 2017 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 6, 2017 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 24, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 23, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 23, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 16, 2017 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 31, 2017 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| May 31, 2017 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 9, 2017 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 9, 2017 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 27, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 24, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 13, 2017 | LOPT | LETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE FORWARDED | — |
| Feb 8, 2017 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 7, 2017 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 14, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 14, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 13, 2017 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 14, 2016 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - MAILED | — |
| Dec 14, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 14, 2016 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Dec 14, 2016 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 31, 2016 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 28, 2016 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 13, 2016 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 30, 2016 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 30, 2016 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Mar 30, 2016 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Mar 29, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 21, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 9, 2016 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jan 5, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 3, 2016 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |