Drawing for BURKE

USPTO serial 79179982

BURKE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
NOBLE, ANNIE MELISSA
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 109 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BURKE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
028Golf clubs, golf bags, with or without wheels; divot repair tools golf accessories; golf divot tools; golf ball cleaner; golf ball selector; golf ball carrier; golf ball distributor; balls for games; golf glovesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 28, 2026DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Oct 28, 2017FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Oct 9, 2017FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Oct 7, 2017FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Jun 16, 2017OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
May 31, 2017OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
May 31, 2017OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Oct 7, 2016MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 7, 2016ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 26, 2016RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Mar 10, 2016RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Mar 10, 2016RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Mar 10, 2016RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Mar 9, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 8, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jan 12, 2016MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED
Jan 6, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Jan 3, 2016REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance