Drawing for IONOGRIND

USPTO serial 79180352

IONOGRIND

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 5033885Status 706Renewal
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Sep 6, 2016
Examiner
VAGHANI, MAYUR C
Law office
Historical data usage

What this means

This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.

Need help with IONOGRIND?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $748*

Plus Government fees of $1,700

Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Liane L. Churney

Liane L. Churney Flynn Thiel, P.C.2026 Rambling RoadKalamazoo, MI 49008-1631United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
001Chemicals used in industry and science; [ chemicals used in the metallurgical industry, in particular metal-hardening preparations, metal-hardening oils; hydraulic fluids used in industry; coolants used in industry; ] liquid dielectric as a chemical preparation for use in industry, in particular those made of synthetically manufactured hydrocarbon productsACTIVE—
004[ Industrial oil and greases, motor oils and lubricating greases; lubricating oils; preparations, liquids and oils for cutting and/or non-cutting metalworking, namely, cutting fluids, cutting oil for industrial metal working; ] chemical cutting and lubricating grinding fluids and oils [ ; hydraulic oils used in industry; cooling oils used in industry; fuels ]ACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 3, 2026NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Sep 3, 202671AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Aug 10, 2026APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Apr 28, 2026ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Nov 6, 2025RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Sep 6, 2025REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
May 10, 2022NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
May 10, 2022C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Apr 27, 2022APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Sep 15, 2021ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Sep 6, 2021REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
Jun 9, 2017OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 17, 2017FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 30, 2017FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jan 30, 2017FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Dec 6, 2016FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Sep 6, 2016R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jun 21, 2016NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jun 21, 2016PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 1, 2016OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Jun 1, 2016OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jun 1, 2016NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
May 16, 2016CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 16, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 16, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 16, 2016TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 25, 2016NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Feb 27, 2016RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 10, 2016RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Feb 10, 2016RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Feb 10, 2016RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Feb 9, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 8, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 15, 2016MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Jan 11, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jan 7, 2016REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance