Drawing for OPRA

USPTO serial 79180383

OPRA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
ALESKOW, DAVID HOWARD
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with OPRA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
018Suitcases; pocket wallets; travel baggage; sport bags; beach bags; evening handbags; shoe bags for travel; small bags for men; toiletry bags sold empty; leather key cases; trunks (luggage); unfitted vanity cases; holdalls; pouches for holding make-up, keys and other personal items; hat boxes of leather; satchels; attache cases; business card cases; tie cases for travel; carrying cases for documents; travel cases; luggage label holders; belt bags; hip bags; hipsacks; clutches (purses); music cases; haversacks; backpacks; handbags; pursesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 21, 2026DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Oct 28, 2017FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 26, 2017FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Sep 26, 2017FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jun 23, 2017OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 7, 2017OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Jun 7, 2017OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Sep 26, 2016MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 26, 2016ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 1, 2016RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 25, 2016NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Feb 29, 2016RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Feb 29, 2016RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Feb 27, 2016RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Feb 26, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 19, 2016RFWRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) WITHDRAWN FOR REVIEW—
Feb 19, 2016RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Feb 18, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 18, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 19, 2016MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Jan 14, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jan 13, 2016LIMILIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED—
Jan 7, 2016REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance