USPTO serial 79180475
ONIXLINE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CORWIN, KEVIN SCOTT
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ONIXLINE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 18, 2026 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| May 19, 2024 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 27, 2021 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 14, 2018 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 3, 2017 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 17, 2017 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 17, 2017 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 23, 2017 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 7, 2017 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 7, 2017 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 17, 2016 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 17, 2016 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 13, 2016 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 18, 2016 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 18, 2016 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Mar 18, 2016 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Mar 17, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 17, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 16, 2016 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jan 12, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 7, 2016 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |