Drawing for JET

USPTO serial 79180624

JET

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GILLES, DEBORAH LYNN MEINERS
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with JET?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Peter W. Peterson

Peter W. Peterson DeLio, Peterson & Curcio, LLC700 State StreetSuite 402New Haven, CT 06511

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042Robots being machines; various light sources including LED; electromagnetic fields and electromagnetic waves; electrical machinery and apparatus, electronic machines and apparatus, telecommunication machines and apparatus, medical machinery and apparatus; electrical appliances; electrical apparatus; parts and fittings for the aforementioned goodsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 12, 2026DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Aug 18, 2017FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 31, 2017FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jul 29, 2017FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jun 30, 2017OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 14, 2017OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Jun 14, 2017OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Aug 5, 2016RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 29, 2016MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Jul 29, 2016ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Jul 28, 2016EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Jun 16, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 16, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 25, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 25, 2016CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
May 24, 2016ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 12, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 12, 2016TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 27, 2016ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 27, 2016REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Feb 13, 2016RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 22, 2016RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jan 22, 2016RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jan 21, 2016RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jan 20, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 19, 2016MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Jan 15, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 15, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jan 14, 2016REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance