Drawing for IMEX

USPTO serial 79180691

IMEX

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
O'BRIEN, JENNIFER LYNN
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 120 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with IMEX?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Lin-Yun Cheng

Lin-Yun Cheng Pro-TECHTOR International Services20775 Norada Ct.Saratoga, CA 95070UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
019Bricks; mosaics for building, namely, mosaics made of natural stone and stone tile; pantiles, not of metal; tiles, not of metal, for building; glass mosaics for use in building construction; floor tiles, not of metal; ceramic tiles; wall tiles, not of metal, for building; terrazzo, namely, floor panels not of metalSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 18, 2026DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Jun 18, 2026DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Jun 15, 2018FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
May 15, 2018FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
May 15, 2018FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jun 30, 2017OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 14, 2017OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Jun 14, 2017OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
May 16, 2017MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 15, 2017ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 8, 2016GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Oct 8, 2016GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 8, 2016CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 20, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 19, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 19, 2016TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 13, 2016RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 25, 2016RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Mar 25, 2016RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Mar 25, 2016RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Mar 24, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 17, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 19, 2016MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Jan 15, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jan 14, 2016REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance