USPTO serial 79180703
ANLAPUS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 5029309Status 706Renewal
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 30, 2016
- Examiner
- CORNWELL, ANDREA B
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with ANLAPUS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $299*
Plus Government fees of $850
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Timothy A. Duffy
Timothy A. Duffy Law Office of Timothy A. Duffy, P.C.725 W Orchard CirLake Forest, IL 60045United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Theft alarms; electric parts for anti-theft alarms for personal electronic devices, namely, electronic sensors, remote control transmitters and receivers for remotely sounding an alarm on and locating stolen personal electronic devices, namely, mobile phones, personal computers, electronic organizers; computer programs for use in monitoring security alarm systems; data processing apparatus; transmitters of electronic signals; video recorders; camcorders; electric control panels; computer software for application and database integration; computer software for use in database management | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Ansjer Electronics Co., Ltd.
- Other trademarks owned by Ansjer Electronics Co., Ltd.
- Other trademarks owned by Ansjer Electronics Co., Ltd.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named ANLAPUS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 28, 2026 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 25, 2025 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Aug 30, 2025 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 21, 2022 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 21, 2022 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 17, 2022 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| May 26, 2022 | PR71 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC.71 | — |
| May 23, 2022 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| May 18, 2022 | PR71 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC.71 | — |
| May 10, 2022 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 12, 2021 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 30, 2021 | REM3 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 1, 2019 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 22, 2017 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 22, 2017 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 6, 2017 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 16, 2016 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 16, 2016 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Nov 30, 2016 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 30, 2016 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 28, 2016 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 14, 2016 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 1, 2016 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 1, 2016 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 25, 2016 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 13, 2016 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 12, 2016 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 11, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 10, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 10, 2016 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| May 3, 2016 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 2, 2016 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 29, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 29, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 29, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 23, 2016 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 23, 2016 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Mar 23, 2016 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Mar 22, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 17, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 23, 2016 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jan 19, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 15, 2016 | LIMI | LIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Jan 14, 2016 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |