Drawing for WELLNESS WATER

USPTO serial 79180859

WELLNESS WATER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
THOMAS-RIGGS, LESLIE A
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 125 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with WELLNESS WATER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Sangwon Kim

Sangwon Kim Revolution IP, PLLC1940 Duke Street Suite 200Alexandria, VA 22314UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
011Water purifier for commercial purpose; electric water ionizers; water softeners apparatus for industrial purposeSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
035Wholesale store services featuring water purifier for commercial purpose; retail store services featuring water purifier for commercial purpose; retail or wholesale services for water purifiers via online shopping malls; sales agency services ,namely, retail and wholesale store services for water purifier for commercial purpose; sales arranging of water purifier for commercial purpose; intermediary services relating to mail order selling by electric communications for water purifier for commercial purposeSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 7, 2026DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
May 7, 2026DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Jul 13, 2018FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 11, 2018FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jun 9, 2018FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Feb 23, 2018NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jul 8, 2017OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 21, 2017OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Jun 21, 2017OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jun 9, 2017MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 9, 2017ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 9, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 20, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 2, 2016GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Sep 2, 2016GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 2, 2016CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 9, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 8, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 8, 2016TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 8, 2016ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 8, 2016REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Mar 4, 2016RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 12, 2016RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Feb 12, 2016RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Feb 12, 2016RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Feb 11, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 4, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 2, 2016MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Jan 28, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jan 21, 2016REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance