USPTO serial 79180882
SUS-PHILOSOPHY QUEST GAS SHOCK ABSORBER TECHNOLOGY MANUFACTURED BY HD SYSTEM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 5102483Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 20, 2016
- Examiner
- MAYER, DAVID COREY
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SUS-PHILOSOPHY QUEST GAS SHOCK ABSORBER TECHNOLOGY MANUFACTURED BY HD SYSTEM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Richard M. LaBarge
STYP PATENT LAW FIRM#503~#504, JooEun-Leaderstel,921 Doonsan-Dong,Daejeon 302-828,Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 012 | Air springs for vehicles; laminated leaf-springs for vehicles; shock absorbers for automobiles; shock absorbing springs for motor cars; shock absorbing springs for vehicles; vehicle suspension springs; spring-assisted hydraulic shock absorbers for vehicles; suspension shock absorbers for vehicles | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by HD SYSTEM Co., Ltd.
- Other trademarks owned by HD SYSTEM Co., Ltd.
- Other trademarks owned by HD SYSTEM Co., Ltd.
- Other trademarks in Class 012
- Similar marks named SUS-PHILOSOPHY QUEST GAS SHOCK ABSORBER TECHNOLOGY MANUFACTURED BY HD SYSTEM
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 18, 2026 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Apr 22, 2024 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Mar 15, 2024 | XXSS | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 15, 2024 | XXCR | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED | — |
| Mar 7, 2024 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Jul 7, 2023 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Nov 7, 2018 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Jul 21, 2017 | FINV | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 22, 2017 | XXSS | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 22, 2017 | XXCR | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED | — |
| Mar 20, 2017 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 20, 2016 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 16, 2016 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 4, 2016 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 14, 2016 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 14, 2016 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 14, 2016 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 23, 2016 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 19, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 19, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 19, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 26, 2016 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 7, 2016 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 7, 2016 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Mar 5, 2016 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Mar 4, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 3, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 2, 2016 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jan 28, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 21, 2016 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |