Drawing for NEXT GENERATION CACAO

USPTO serial 79180895

NEXT GENERATION CACAO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 5173502Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Apr 4, 2017
Examiner
HUSSAIN, TASNEEM
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with NEXT GENERATION CACAO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

CLIFORD D. HYRA

CLIFORD D. HYRA Fresh IP PLC11710 Plaza America Dr., Ste 2000RESTON, VA 20190UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
030Cocoa and cocoa powder; cocoa powder for the preparation of cocoa beverages; cocoa based beverages; chocolate and chocolate products, namely, chocolate confection, chocolate bars, chocolate pastes and pralinesSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 12, 2026DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Feb 12, 2026DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Aug 10, 2024INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Jul 20, 2024INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Jul 20, 2024INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Jun 21, 2024INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Oct 20, 2023C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Apr 4, 2022REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
Jan 16, 2020TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jan 7, 2020TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jan 25, 2018ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Aug 4, 2017FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 13, 2017FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jul 13, 2017FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Jul 4, 2017FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Apr 4, 2017R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jan 17, 2017PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 12, 2017GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 28, 2016OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Dec 28, 2016OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Dec 28, 2016NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Dec 13, 2016PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Nov 23, 2016CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 22, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 22, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 8, 2016ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 29, 2016NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - MAILED—
Oct 28, 2016TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 28, 2016PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Oct 28, 2016PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Sep 1, 2016MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 1, 2016ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 20, 2016RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 2, 2016RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Feb 2, 2016RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Feb 2, 2016MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Jan 30, 2016RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jan 29, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 28, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 28, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jan 22, 2016LIMILIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED—
Jan 21, 2016REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance