Drawing for DINGO

USPTO serial 79181394

DINGO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BAGLINI, KAREN
Law office
TTAB

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DINGO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Vivian Ortiz Ponce

PO BOX 9024163SAN JUAN, PR 00902-4163UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
031Animal foodstuffsABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 5, 2024DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Feb 4, 2024DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Aug 20, 2021NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jun 14, 2019FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
May 24, 2019FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
May 24, 2019FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
May 24, 2018MAB4ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION—
May 24, 2018ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
May 24, 2018OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
May 24, 2018OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999—
Mar 2, 2018RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 8, 2018OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Feb 1, 2018OPNSOPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) SENT TO IB—
Feb 1, 2018OPNCOPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) CREATED—
Nov 17, 2017GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 6, 2017ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Oct 3, 2017NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Oct 3, 2017PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 13, 2017OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Sep 13, 2017OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Sep 13, 2017NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Aug 28, 2017EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Aug 28, 2017CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 28, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 28, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 25, 2017ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 10, 2017EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Aug 10, 2017JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Aug 9, 2017NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Aug 9, 2017PGTTPETITION GRANTED - TTAB APPEAL FILED—
Aug 7, 2017EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jul 27, 2017APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF—
Jul 25, 2017EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jul 24, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 24, 2017PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Jul 14, 2017OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 28, 2017OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Jun 28, 2017OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
May 22, 2017MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 22, 2017ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 21, 2016GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Oct 21, 2016GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 21, 2016CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 29, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 28, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 28, 2016TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 26, 2016ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 26, 2016REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
May 13, 2016RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 28, 2016RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Mar 28, 2016RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Mar 27, 2016RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Mar 26, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 23, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 9, 2016MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Feb 3, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jan 30, 2016SDRCSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance