Drawing for MY!KITCHEN

USPTO serial 79181629

MY!KITCHEN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
JACKSON, WILLIAM D
Law office
LAW OFFICE 117 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MY!KITCHEN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
020Furniture, furniture of all kinds, including of metal, of wood, of plastic, modular furniture, kitchens, kitchen units, chairs, tables, cupboards, built-in cupboards, beds, settees, all of natural and artificial materials, including furniture accessories not of metal, decorative objects and works of art of wood, individual mirrors, mirrors as parts of furniture and interior decor, custom-made furniture, cabinet workSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 9, 2026DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Nov 29, 2017CORNCORRECTION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED—
Nov 24, 2017CRCVCORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB—
Nov 17, 2017OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 20, 2017FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 7, 2017FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Sep 7, 2017FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jul 5, 2017OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Jul 5, 2017OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Sep 7, 2016MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 7, 2016ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 27, 2016RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 13, 2016MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Feb 10, 2016RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Feb 10, 2016RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Feb 10, 2016RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Feb 9, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 9, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 9, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Feb 5, 2016LIMILIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED—
Feb 4, 2016REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance