Where is the live CopyMark page for USPTO serial 79181654?

The live record is at https://getcopymark.com/trademark/79181654. Use https://getcopymark.com/trademark/{serialNumber} for any 8-digit USPTO serial.

Who owns FRUIT SQUEEZE?

According to the public USPTO record for serial number 79181654, the listed owner(s) include: Lisa Kim Peart, Lisa Kim Peart, Lloyd Mark Brown, Lisa Kim Peart, Aviemore Trustees Limited, Lloyd Mark Brown, Lisa Kim Peart, Aviemore Trustees Limited, Aviemore Trustees Limited as trustees in the Synergy Trust, Aviemore Trustees Limited as trustees in the Synergy Trust.

What is USPTO serial number 79181654?

Serial number 79181654 is the USPTO application identifier for the mark FRUIT SQUEEZE. It is used to track examination, publication, and registration of this trademark.

Which trademark classes cover FRUIT SQUEEZE?

The public record lists International Classes: 032. Each class corresponds to categories of goods or services identified in the application or registration.

Trademark: FRUIT SQUEEZE Serial# 79181654 | status 402; last event DENA | Trademark Info & Attorney Guidance

Q: What is the current status of FRUIT SQUEEZE?

FRUIT SQUEEZE (79181654) currently shows USPTO status code 402 on the public record. This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FRUIT SQUEEZE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner

Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.

Trademark Monitoring

(312) 319-4460

Not the owner?

File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Start a new application

(312) 319-4460

Owner

Goods and services

Class	Description	Status	First use
032	Fruit juice	SECTION 70 - CANCELLED	—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Date	Code	Event	What it means
Jul 9, 2026	DENA	NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED	—
Jul 9, 2026	DETH	DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION	—
Nov 2, 2018	FINT	FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB	—
Oct 15, 2018	FICS	FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB	—
Oct 13, 2018	FICR	FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB	—
Oct 16, 2017	MAB3	ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL	—
Oct 2, 2017	ABN3	ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL	—
Oct 2, 2017	EXPT	EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED	—
Jul 21, 2017	OPNX	NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB	—
Jul 18, 2017	EXPA	EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED	—
Jul 5, 2017	OPNS	NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB	—
Jul 5, 2017	OPNR	NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB	—
May 1, 2017	GNSN	NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED	—
May 1, 2017	GNES	EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED	—
May 1, 2017	CNES	EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED	—
Mar 3, 2017	JURT	JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY	—
Dec 19, 2016	EXPI	EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED	—
Dec 19, 2016	JURT	JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY	—
Dec 19, 2016	EXAF	EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB	—
Nov 21, 2016	RDX3	NOTIFICATION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED	—
Nov 21, 2016	RDX1	ACTION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED E-MAILED	—
Nov 21, 2016	RRDX	ACTION REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED COUNTED NOT MAILED	—
Oct 28, 2016	TEME	TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED	—
Oct 27, 2016	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
Oct 27, 2016	ERFR	TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED	—
Oct 12, 2016	RDX3	NOTIFICATION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED	—
Oct 12, 2016	RDX1	ACTION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED E-MAILED	—
Oct 12, 2016	RRDX	ACTION REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED COUNTED NOT MAILED	—
Sep 19, 2016	TEME	TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED	—
Sep 18, 2016	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
Sep 18, 2016	ERFR	TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED	—
Jun 21, 2016	GNFN	NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED	—
Jun 21, 2016	GNFR	FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED	A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 21, 2016	CNFR	FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN	A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 27, 2016	TEME	TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED	—
May 27, 2016	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
May 27, 2016	TROA	TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED	This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 18, 2016	TEME	TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED	—
May 17, 2016	TCCA	TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED	—
May 17, 2016	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
May 17, 2016	TROA	TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED	This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 13, 2016	RFNT	REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB	—
Mar 28, 2016	RFCS	NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB	—
Mar 28, 2016	RFRR	REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU	—
Mar 26, 2016	RFCR	NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW	—
Mar 25, 2016	CNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 15, 2016	DOCK	ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER	—
Feb 13, 2016	MAFR	APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED	—
Feb 9, 2016	NWOS	NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED	—
Feb 4, 2016	REPR	SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB	—

FRUIT SQUEEZE