USPTO serial 79181676
LASHAFFAIR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MORRIS, KRISTINA KLOIBER
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with LASHAFFAIR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James L. Vana
JAMES L VANA PERKINS COIE LLP1201 THIRD AVENUESUITE 4900SEATTLE, WA 98101Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Decorative cosmetics; Mascara | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 17, 2017 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 15, 2017 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 14, 2017 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jul 14, 2017 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Jul 5, 2017 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 5, 2017 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 19, 2017 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Apr 5, 2017 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 5, 2017 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 5, 2017 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 4, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 4, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 29, 2017 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 15, 2017 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 15, 2017 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Mar 15, 2017 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Mar 15, 2017 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jan 19, 2017 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 21, 2016 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Sep 21, 2016 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 21, 2016 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 30, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 29, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 29, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 12, 2016 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 12, 2016 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 19, 2016 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 29, 2016 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 29, 2016 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Feb 28, 2016 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Feb 27, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 23, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 13, 2016 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Feb 9, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 4, 2016 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |