USPTO serial 79181749
INTERNET WATCH FOUNDATION
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- COLLOPY, DIANE PATRICIA
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with INTERNET WATCH FOUNDATION?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software; electronic publications; information stored on electronic, magnetic and/or by optical means; publications in electronic form supplied on line from a database or from facilities provided on the internet or other networks (including web sites); databases; database of URLs of websites with criminal content or child sexual abuse content | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | Design and development of computer software; monitoring of the websites and the internet for illegal content (terms considered too vague by the International Bureau - rule 13(2)(b) of the Common Regulations); provision of information and reporting helpline services relating to illegal content on websites and the internet (terms considered too vague by the International Bureau - rule 13(2)(b) of the Common Regulations); provision of technical information services relating to illegal, criminal and child sexual abuse content on websites and the internet and the legal and regulatory aspects thereof; provision of automated notice and take down and content blocking services to internet service providers (ISP's) relating to illegal, criminal and child sexual abuse content on the internet and website servers; data security services; computer security consultancy; professional consultancy relating to computer security; expert reporting services relating to technology; analysis of data (terms considered too vague by the International Bureau - rule 13(2)(b) of the Common Regulations); computerised analysis of data (terms considered too vague by the International Bureau - rule 13(2)(b) of the Common Regulations); technical data analysis services; database design and development; testing and monitoring of telecommunication signals; domain name system (DNS) name blocking services and consultancy and advice relating thereto; certification (quality control); certification and testing services for websites in respect of the technical prevention of criminal content and child sexual abuse imagery online; technical certification and testing services for websites in respect of the technical prevention of criminal content and child sexual abuse imagery online; certification and testing services in respect of the technical prevention of criminal content and child sexual abuse imagery online; technical certification and testing services in respect of the prevention of criminal content and child sexual abuse imagery online; information, advisory and consultancy services relating to the aforesaid | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 045 | Legal information services, via a website, relating to the regulatory and legal aspects of illegal, criminal and child sexual abuse content on websites and the internet | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 5, 2026 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Feb 1, 2019 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 17, 2017 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 31, 2017 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 28, 2017 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 21, 2017 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 5, 2017 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 5, 2017 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 28, 2016 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 28, 2016 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 13, 2016 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 1, 2016 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 1, 2016 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Apr 1, 2016 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Mar 31, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 13, 2016 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Feb 9, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 9, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 5, 2016 | LIMI | LIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Feb 4, 2016 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |