Drawing for CHIA ME UP

USPTO serial 79181788

CHIA ME UP

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LAWRENCE, SUSAN KASTRINER
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CHIA ME UP?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029Edible seeds (terms considered too vague by the International Bureau - rule 13.2.b) of the Common Regulations); seeds prepared for human consumptionSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
031Edible seeds (unprocessed); seeds prepared for consumption by animalsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 26, 2026DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
May 30, 2018CORNCORRECTION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED—
May 18, 2018CRCVCORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB—
Nov 9, 2017IRRHIRREGULARITY FROM IB EXAMINED BY MPU—
Oct 11, 2017IRFIIRREGULARITY ON FINAL DECISION RECEIVED FROM IB—
Sep 22, 2017OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 22, 2017DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Sep 21, 2017DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Sep 15, 2017FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Sep 15, 2017FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jul 5, 2017OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Jul 5, 2017OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Sep 15, 2016MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 15, 2016ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 11, 2016RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 19, 2016RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Feb 18, 2016RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Feb 17, 2016RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Feb 16, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 13, 2016MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Feb 9, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 9, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Feb 4, 2016REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance