Drawing for KI KO

USPTO serial 79181892

KI KO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
EISNACH, MICHAEL PATRICK
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with KI KO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029MarmaladeSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 25, 2026DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Aug 7, 2025ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Dec 5, 2024ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Jul 11, 2019ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
May 4, 2018FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 15, 2018FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Mar 15, 2018FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jul 21, 2017OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 5, 2017OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Jul 5, 2017OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Mar 15, 2017MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 15, 2017ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 17, 2016CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 17, 2016CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 28, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 28, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 18, 2016ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 13, 2016TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 19, 2016RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 26, 2016RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Feb 26, 2016RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Feb 25, 2016RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Feb 24, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 18, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 13, 2016MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Feb 9, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Feb 4, 2016REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance