Drawing for DELIRIOUS

USPTO serial 79182019

DELIRIOUS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LEE, YATSYE ISADORA
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DELIRIOUS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Nicholas D. Wells

Nicholas D. Wells Legends Law Group, PLLC330 N. Main St.Kaysville, UT 84037UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Spectacle cases; eyeglass chains; eyeglass cords; spectacle lens; spectacle frames; spectacles; sunglasses; pince-nez; anti-glare glasses; eyeglasses for reading; snow goggles; ski goggles; goggles for sports; protective eyewear; corrective eyeglassesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 21, 2026DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
May 21, 2026DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Dec 15, 2018FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 28, 2018FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Nov 28, 2018FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Nov 28, 2017MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 28, 2017ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 28, 2017OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 12, 2017OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Jul 12, 2017OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Apr 13, 2017GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Apr 13, 2017GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 13, 2017CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 6, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 6, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 6, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 30, 2016GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 30, 2016GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 30, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 24, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 24, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 24, 2016TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 18, 2016NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Mar 19, 2016RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 29, 2016RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Feb 29, 2016RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Feb 25, 2016RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Feb 24, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 23, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 20, 2016MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Feb 16, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Feb 11, 2016REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance