USPTO serial 79182029
SOLITH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 5093387Status 706Renewal
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 6, 2016
- Examiner
- ROBERTSON, DEIRDRE G
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with SOLITH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $748*
Plus Government fees of $1,300
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Sara M. Dorchak
Sara M. Dorchak Collard & Roe, P.C.1077 Northern BoulevardRoslyn, NY 11576UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Machines for manufacturing lithium batteries; machines, equipment and machine tools for manufacturing lithium batteries, battery component and accumulators of electrical energy, and parts of the aforesaid products; lithium batteries assembling machines; winder machines for the manufacturing of lithium batteries; electrode and separator stacking machine; enveloping machine for lithium cells; machines for applying electrolyte for lithium-cells | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | Battery charging apparatus; apparatus for electrochemical charging of batteries; [ electric batteries; ] battery chargers; battery testers; [ lithium batteries; rechargeable batteries; ] testing devices for lithium batteries; devices for charging lithium cells; apparatus for maintaining the charge in lithium cells; measuring and testing machines and instruments, namely, apparatus for testing the electrical charging process of batteries and for testing electrical parameters of batteries; computer software development tools; software for controlling and managing apparatus for testing the electrical parameters of batteries; electronic devices for verifying life cycle of batteries and electronic devices for verifying reserve capacity of batteries; operating software and electronic controlling devices for machines for the manufacturing of batteries | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 6, 2025 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 10, 2025 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Mar 17, 2024 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Feb 7, 2024 | INPS | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 7, 2024 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Feb 1, 2024 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Jun 1, 2023 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 1, 2023 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| May 29, 2023 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 17, 2022 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 2, 2018 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Apr 1, 2017 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 9, 2017 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 9, 2017 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Mar 6, 2017 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 6, 2016 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 16, 2016 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 20, 2016 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 31, 2016 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 31, 2016 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 31, 2016 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 18, 2016 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 12, 2016 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 12, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 12, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 12, 2016 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 4, 2016 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 4, 2016 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 3, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 11, 2016 | RFNP | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 20, 2016 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Feb 19, 2016 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 19, 2016 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Feb 19, 2016 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Feb 18, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 16, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 16, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 11, 2016 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |