Drawing for APPLE CAR

USPTO serial 79182207

APPLE CAR

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CHISOLM, KEVON
Law office
TTAB

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with APPLE CAR?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Ben Natter

BEN NATTER Haug Partners, LLP745 Fifth AvenueNew York, NY 10151UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
027Pillow mats; reed mats; door mats; gymnasium mats; bath mats; non-slip mats; floor matsABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 2, 2026DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Jul 2, 2026DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
May 19, 2018FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 6, 2018FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Apr 6, 2018FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Apr 6, 2017MAB4ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION—
Apr 6, 2017ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Apr 6, 2017OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Apr 6, 2017OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999—
Mar 16, 2017TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jan 20, 2017RFNPREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 14, 2016OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Dec 1, 2016OPNSOPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) SENT TO IB—
Dec 1, 2016OPNCOPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) CREATED—
Sep 9, 2016OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 1, 2016ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Aug 2, 2016NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Aug 2, 2016PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 13, 2016OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Jul 13, 2016OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jul 13, 2016NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jun 30, 2016TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jun 30, 2016TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jun 29, 2016CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 28, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 28, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 28, 2016TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 13, 2016RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 12, 2016RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Apr 12, 2016RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Apr 12, 2016RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Apr 11, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 6, 2016RFWRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) WITHDRAWN FOR REVIEW—
Apr 6, 2016RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Apr 5, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 28, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 20, 2016MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Feb 16, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Feb 11, 2016REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance