Drawing for UNIDRIVE

USPTO serial 79182474

UNIDRIVE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 5314152Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Oct 24, 2017
Examiner
RIEPEL, CHRISTINA MAXINE
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with UNIDRIVE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Avital (Tally) Eitan

EITAN MEHULAL & SADOT10 ABBA EBAN BOULEVARDHERZELIA,ISRAEL

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Machines and equipment for automated parking garage or automated parking facility, namely elevators cranes and lifting machines for vehicles; loading apparatus, namely, loading machines in the nature of a machine operated transporting apparatus enabling unmanned positioning, transporting, lifting, loading and turning of vehicles for their automated parking and retrieval; machine operated moving platforms and turning platforms and pallets for use in automated parking garages; machine operated platforms in the nature of movable entry bays and exit bays for use in parking garages; none of these goods to be in the field of drives for machinesSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
037Installation, maintenance, technical support in the nature of providing technical repair advice and repair services of automated parking garage machines and equipment and automated logistics systems, namely, lifting apparatus, loading apparatus, transporting apparatus enabling unmanned positioning, transporting, lifting, loading and turning of vehicles for their automated parking and retrieval for automated parking garage or automated parking facility, and excluding softwareSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
040Custom manufacture of a parking solution system, namely, an automated parking garage consisting of elevators, moving platforms, turning platforms, shuttle cars, entry bays, exit bays, pallets, electric motors for machines and control systems consisting of computer hardware, programmable logic controllers, user interface display and keyboardSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 25, 2026DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Apr 19, 2025INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Mar 27, 2025INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Mar 27, 2025INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Jan 11, 2025INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
May 10, 2024C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Mar 16, 2018FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 31, 2018FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jan 31, 2018FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Jan 24, 2018FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Oct 24, 2017R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Aug 8, 2017PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 4, 2017GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 28, 2017OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 19, 2017OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Jul 19, 2017OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jul 19, 2017NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jul 12, 2017OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Jul 12, 2017OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jul 6, 2017PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 5, 2017CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 3, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 3, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 3, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 20, 2017RFNPREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 20, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 17, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 31, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 31, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 21, 2017ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 29, 2016NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - MAILED—
Dec 29, 2016TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 29, 2016PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Dec 29, 2016PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Oct 31, 2016MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 31, 2016ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 15, 2016ATRVATTORNEY REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 15, 2016LIMELIMITATION FROM THE IB - REQUEST EXAM REVIEW—
Jul 14, 2016LIMGLIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB—
May 13, 2016RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 4, 2016RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Apr 4, 2016RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Apr 2, 2016RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Apr 1, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 22, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 23, 2016MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Feb 17, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Feb 11, 2016REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance