USPTO serial 79182502
DATASPIDER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BAGLINI, KAREN
- Law office
- LAW OFFICE 117 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DATASPIDER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software for data processing, data conversion and data integration; downloadable computer software for data processing and conversion | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | Data conversion of electronic information using computers; consulting services relating to data conversion of electronic information using computers; conversion of data or documents from physical to electronic media; designing, programming or maintaining computer software; providing in the nature of rental of non-downloadable computer programs for conversion of electronic data using computers; rental of computers; rental of computer software; providing temporary use of computer non-downloadable programs for conversion and integration of electronic data; computer time-sharing services to computer database via the Internet | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Saison Information Systems Co., Ltd.
- Other trademarks owned by Saison Technology Co., Ltd.
- Other trademarks owned by APPRESSO K.K.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named DATASPIDER
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 18, 2026 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 18, 2026 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| May 11, 2024 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Jul 4, 2019 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jul 5, 2018 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Feb 10, 2018 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 23, 2018 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 23, 2018 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 6, 2017 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 28, 2017 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 12, 2017 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 12, 2017 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 23, 2017 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 23, 2017 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 25, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 25, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 25, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 22, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 22, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 22, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 20, 2016 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 20, 2016 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 13, 2016 | RFNP | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 28, 2016 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 28, 2016 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Mar 27, 2016 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Mar 26, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 23, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 23, 2016 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Feb 17, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 11, 2016 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |