USPTO serial 79182551
KNUTHENLUND
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 31, 2017
- Examiner
- MAIHOS, JESSIE ANDREA
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with KNUTHENLUND?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Knuthenlund, c/o Susanne Hovmand-Simonsen
DK
Other trademarks owned by Knuthenlund, c/o Susanne Hovmand-Simonsen
Knuthenlund, c/o Susanne Hovmand-Simonsen
DK
Other trademarks owned by Knuthenlund, c/o Susanne Hovmand-Simonsen
Knuthenlund, c/o Susanne Hovmand-Simonsen
DK
Other trademarks owned by Knuthenlund, c/o Susanne Hovmand-Simonsen
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Peter Gustav Olson
NJORD Law Firm AdvokatpartnerselskabPilestræde 58DK-1112 Copenhagen K,DENMARKGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Meat, game; milk and milk products, excluding ice cream; ice milk, and frozen yogurt | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 030 | Food from plants prepared for human consumption, namely, flour, pasta, honey, bread, pastry, cakes; seeds, namely, milled flax seeds and poppy seeds; processed grains | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Knuthenlund, c/o Susanne Hovmand-Simonsen
- Other trademarks owned by Knuthenlund, c/o Susanne Hovmand-Simonsen
- Other trademarks owned by Knuthenlund, c/o Susanne Hovmand-Simonsen
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Similar marks named KNUTHENLUND
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 14, 2024 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Apr 14, 2024 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Apr 13, 2018 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 8, 2018 | XXSS | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 8, 2018 | XXCR | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED | — |
| Jan 31, 2018 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 31, 2017 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 15, 2017 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 11, 2017 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 28, 2017 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 26, 2017 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 26, 2017 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 26, 2017 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 12, 2017 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 12, 2017 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 7, 2017 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 6, 2017 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 5, 2017 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 5, 2017 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 2, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 2, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 2, 2017 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 5, 2016 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 3, 2016 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 10, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 10, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 10, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 26, 2016 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 11, 2016 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| May 11, 2016 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| May 11, 2016 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| May 10, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 10, 2016 | RFWR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) WITHDRAWN FOR REVIEW | — |
| May 10, 2016 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| May 9, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 4, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 23, 2016 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Feb 17, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 11, 2016 | SDRC | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB | — |