Drawing for HERO DEFENSE

USPTO serial 79182629

HERO DEFENSE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 5088925Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Nov 29, 2016
Examiner
BAGLINI, KAREN
Law office
—

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with HERO DEFENSE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Nicholas D. Wells

Nicholas D. Wells Legends Law Group PLLC330 Main St.Kaysville, UT 84037UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer game programs; interactive multimedia computer game programs; interactive video game software; interactive video game programsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
028[ Skill and action games in the nature of action skill games; action figures as toys or playthings; toy action figurines; electric action toys; electronic board games; electronic hand-held game units; electronic educational teaching games; electronic games for the teaching of children; electronic arcade games that are coin or counter operated apparatus; handheld electronic video games, namely, hand-held games with liquid crystal displays; electronic activity toys, namely, electronic action toys ]SECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 16, 2026DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Jul 16, 2026DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Nov 29, 2025REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Mar 25, 2024INNPPARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Feb 28, 2024INPSPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Feb 28, 2024INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Feb 17, 2024INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Jun 17, 2023NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Jun 17, 202371.PREGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC 71 ACCEPTED—
Jun 16, 2023APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Nov 29, 2022ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Apr 5, 2022NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Nov 29, 2021REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
Mar 12, 2021NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jul 28, 2017FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 14, 2017XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB—
Mar 14, 2017XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED—
Feb 28, 2017FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Nov 29, 2016R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Sep 13, 2016NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Sep 13, 2016PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 24, 2016NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Aug 9, 2016PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 3, 2016ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 24, 2016CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 22, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 21, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 21, 2016TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 13, 2016RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 15, 2016RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Apr 15, 2016RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Apr 15, 2016RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Apr 14, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 11, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 1, 2016MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Feb 24, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Feb 23, 2016REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance