Drawing for NUTRI DRY

USPTO serial 79182652

NUTRI DRY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 5215658Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jun 6, 2017
Examiner
BAGLINI, KAREN
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with NUTRI DRY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jeffrey H. Greger

JEFFREY H. GREGER HAUPTMAN HAM, LLP2318 MILL ROADSUITE 1400ALEXANDRIA, VA 22314UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
011Electric food dehydrators; electric dehydratorsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 16, 2026DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Jul 16, 2026DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Sep 20, 2024INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Aug 30, 2024INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Aug 30, 2024INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Aug 23, 2024INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Dec 22, 2023C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Jun 6, 2022REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
Oct 28, 2017FINVFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 14, 2017FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Sep 14, 2017FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Sep 6, 2017FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jun 6, 2017R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Mar 21, 2017NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Mar 21, 2017PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 1, 2017NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Feb 13, 2017PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jan 31, 2017EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jan 31, 2017CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 27, 2017DMCCDATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED—
Jan 26, 2017ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 12, 2017ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Jan 12, 2017EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jan 12, 2017JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jan 12, 2017EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Sep 1, 2016NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Aug 8, 2016GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Aug 8, 2016GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 8, 2016CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 15, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 14, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 14, 2016TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 13, 2016RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 19, 2016RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Apr 19, 2016RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Apr 19, 2016RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Apr 18, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 11, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 5, 2016MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Mar 1, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Feb 25, 2016LIMILIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED—
Feb 23, 2016REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance